home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu rec.radio.amateur.misc:29833 rec.radio.cb:2168 news.answers:4598
- Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!news.media.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!news.bbn.com!olivea!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis!pschleck
- From: pschleck@cwis.unomaha.edu (Paul W Schleck KD3FU)
- Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.info,rec.answers,news.answers
- Subject: Guide to the Personal Radio Newsgroups
- Summary: This article provides an overview of the newsgroups devoted
- to the personal radio services (amateur and CB), describes
- each newsgroup and its charter, and gives a brief tutorial
- on netiquette.
- Keywords: radio, amateur, ham, cb, netiquette
- Message-ID: <personal-radio-intro-1-724420846@unomaha.edu>
- Date: 15 Dec 92 12:03:12 GMT
- Expires: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 06:00:00 GMT
- References: <ham-archives-index-1-724420805@unomaha.edu>
- Sender: news@news.unomaha.edu (UNO Network News Server)
- Reply-To: pschleck@unomaha.edu,jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Guide Coordinators)
- Followup-To: poster
- Organization: ACM Student Chapter, University of Nebraska at Omaha
- Lines: 134
- Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
- Supersedes: <personal-radio-intro-1-721828852@unomaha.edu>
- X-Posting-Frequency: posted on the 15th of each month
-
- Posted-By: auto-faq script
- Archive-name: personal-radio-intro
- Revision: 1.2 10/03/92 05:36:06
-
- (Note: The following is reprinted with the permission of the author.)
-
- This message describes the rec.radio.amateur.*, rec.radio.cb, and
- rec.radio.swap newsgroups. It is intended to serve as a guide for the new
- reader on what to find where. Questions and comments may be directed to the
- author, Jay Maynard, K5ZC, by Internet electronic mail at
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu. This message was last changed on 3 June 1992.
-
- History
- =======
-
- Way back when, before there was a Usenet, the Internet hosted a mailing list
- for hams, called (appropriately enough) INFO-HAMS. Ham radio discussions
- were held on the mailing list, and sent to the mailboxes of those who had
- signed up for it. When the Usenet software was created, and net news as we
- now know it was developed, a newsgroup was created for hams: net.ham-radio.
- The mailing list and the newsgroup were gatewayed together, eventually.
-
- As the net grew, and as packet radio came into vogue, packet discussion began
- to dominate other topics in the group and on the list. This resulted in the
- logical solution: a group was created to hold the packet discussion, and
- another corresponding mailing list was created as well: net.ham-radio.packet
- and PACKET-RADIO, respectively.
-
- These two groups served for several years, and went through Usenet's Great
- Renaming essentially unchanged, moving from net.ham-radio[.packet] to
- rec.ham-radio[.packet]. Readership and volume grew with the rest of the
- network.
-
- The INFO-HAMS mailing list was originally run from a US Army computer at
- White Sands Missile Range, SIMTEL20. There were few problems with this
- arrangement, but one was that the system was not supposed to be used for
- commercial purposes. Since one of hams' favorite pastimes is swapping
- gear, it was natural for hams to post messages about equipment for sale
- to INFO-HAMS/rec.ham-radio. This ran afoul of SIMTEL20's no-commercial-use
- restriction, and after some argument, a group was created specifically
- for messages like that: rec.ham-radio.swap. This group wasn't gatewayed to
- a mailing list, thus avoiding problems.
-
- While all this was happening, other folks wanted to discuss other aspects
- of the world of radio than the personal communications services. Those
- folks created the rec.radio.shortwave and rec.radio.noncomm newsgroups,
- and established the precedent of the rec.radio.* hierarchy, which in turn
- reflected Usenet's overall trend toward a hierarchical name structure.
-
- The debate between proponents of a no-code ham radio license and its
- opponents grew fierce and voluminous in late 1989 and 1990. Eventually,
- both sides grew weary of the debate, and those who had not been involved
- even more so. A proposal for a newsgroup dedicated to licensing issues
- failed. A later proposal was made for a group that would cover the many
- recurring legal issues discussions. During discussion of the latter
- proposal, it became clear that it would be desirable to fit the ham radio
- groups under the rec.radio.* hierarchy. A full-blown reorganization was
- passed by Usenet voters in January 1991, leading to the structure we now use.
-
- The Current Groups
- ==================
-
- I can hear you asking, "OK, so this is all neat history, but what does it
- have to do with me now?" The answer is that the history of each group has
- a direct bearing on what the group is used for, and what's considered
- appropriate where.
-
- The easy one is rec.radio.amateur.misc. It is what rec.ham-radio was renamed
- to during the reorganization. Any message that's not more appropriate in one
- of the other groups belongs here, from contesting to DX to ragchewing on VHF
- to information on becoming a ham.
-
- The group rec.radio.amateur.packet is for discussions related to (surprise!)
- packet radio. This doesn't have to be the common two-meter AX.25 variety
- of packet radio, either; some of the most knowledgable folks in radio digital
- communications can be found here, and anything in the general area is welcome.
-
- The swap group is now rec.radio.swap. This recognizes a fact that became
- evident shortly after the original group was formed: Hams don't just swap
- ham radio gear, and other folks besides hams swap ham equipment. If you have
- radio equipment, or test gear, or computer stuff that hams would be
- interested in, here's the place. Equipment wanted postings belong here too.
- Discussions about the equipment generally don't; if you wish to discuss
- a particular posting with the buyer, email is a much better way to do it,
- and the other groups are the place for public discussions. There is now a
- regular posting with information on how to go about buying and selling items
- in rec.radio.swap; please refer to it before you post there.
-
- The reorganization added two groups to the list, one of which is
- rec.radio.amateur.policy. This group was created as a place for all the
- discussions that seem to drag on interminably about the many rules,
- regulations, legalities, and policies that surround amateur radio, both
- existing and proposed. The neverending no-code debate goes here, as does
- the New Jersey scanner law, the legality of ordering a pizza on the
- autopatch, what a bunch of rotten no-goodniks the local frequency
- coordinating body is, and so on.
-
- The other added group is rec.radio.cb. This is the place for all discussion
- about the Citizens' Band radio service. Such discussions have been very
- inflammatory in rec.ham-radio in the past; please do not cross-post to both
- rec.radio.cb and rec.radio.amateur.* unless the topic is genuinely of interest
- to both hams and CBers - and very few topics are.
-
- The rec.radio.amateur.misc, .packet, and .policy groups are available by
- Internet electronic mail in digest format; send a mail message containing
- "help" on a line by itself to listserv@ucsd.edu for details. You can also post
- to rec.radio.swap by sending email to rec-radio-swap@ucbvax.berkeley.edu; if
- you do it this way, be sure to include an address for responses by electronic
- mail, as the gateway does not automatically do so.
-
- A Note on Crossposting
- ======================
-
- Please do not crosspost messages to two or more groups unless there is genuine
- interest in both groups in the topic being discussed, and when you do, please
- include a header line of the form "Followup-To: group.name" in your article's
- headers (before the first blank line). This will cause followups to your
- article to go to the group listed in the Followup-To: line. If you wish
- to have replies to go to you by email, rather than be posted, use the word
- "poster" instead of the name of a group. Such a line appears in the headers
- of this article.
-
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by a .sig virus.
- "Liking clean systems and hating buggy ones is about as controversial as
- preferring a warm puppy to the cholera bacillus." -- Tom Neff
-
- --
- 73, Paul W. Schleck, KD3FU
-
- pschleck@unomaha.edu
-
- Celebrating 60 years of the Univ. of Maryland ARA - W3EAX (1933-1993)
-